Talk:715 exoplanets discovered by Kepler telescope

Review of revision 2434466 [Not ready]

Revision 2434466 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal size for a standalone article. Minimal size is generally considered to be three paragraphs —a concise lede and two additional paragraphs following inverted pyramid style— with total text equivalent to three medium-sized paragraphs (though not necessarily evenly distributed between paragraphs). Here, beside the lack of separation into paragraphs, the total amount of text here is several sentences short. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2434466 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal size for a standalone article. Minimal size is generally considered to be three paragraphs —a concise lede and two additional paragraphs following inverted pyramid style— with total text equivalent to three medium-sized paragraphs (though not necessarily evenly distributed between paragraphs). Here, beside the lack of separation into paragraphs, the total amount of text here is several sentences short. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 2437315 [Passed]

Revision 2437315 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I actually didn't verify anthing new from the Universe Today source, but that may be an artifact of the order in which I read the sources. This is on the outer edge of the usual range of the fresh/stale line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2437315 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I actually didn't verify anthing new from the Universe Today source, but that may be an artifact of the order in which I read the sources. This is on the outer edge of the usual range of the fresh/stale line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

interwiki

{{editprotected}}

Please to add fr:Espace : 715 nouvelles planètes extrasolaires. Thanks --Trek00 (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Link correction

{{editprotected}}

Please correct the link in the first line of the article. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 10:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Done Thanks. --Pi zero (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)