Talk:Former Ukranian PM Yulia Tymoshenko goes on hunger strike

Review of revision 1478869 [Not ready]

Revision 1478869 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Article uses single source. Are other secondary news sources covering this issue? Could use more background info, who what where when why how? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1478869 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Article uses single source. Are other secondary news sources covering this issue? Could use more background info, who what where when why how? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1478943 [Not ready]

Revision 1478943 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Have there been any new developments? Right now, this story is four days old. Verifiability: Not ready: We've gone from one extreme to the other; now there are more sources than sentences. Are all these sources used? I frankly doubt it. There is a policy against listing sources not actually used. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: There is a bare minimum of three paragraphs. Comments by reviewer: I'd advise reading through policy before writing. The core policy documents aren't all that long. If you register an account, you'll receive a welcome template with lots of useful advice and links. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1478943 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Have there been any new developments? Right now, this story is four days old. Verifiability: Not ready: We've gone from one extreme to the other; now there are more sources than sentences. Are all these sources used? I frankly doubt it. There is a policy against listing sources not actually used. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: There is a bare minimum of three paragraphs. Comments by reviewer: I'd advise reading through policy before writing. The core policy documents aren't all that long. If you register an account, you'll receive a welcome template with lots of useful advice and links. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1480196 [Passed]

Revision 1480196 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I overwrote an edit conflict. Please don't edit articles while the {{under review}} tag is on them; it's aim is to prevent edit conflicts. Instead, make comments of any changes you want made on the talk page. Or, feel free to contact the reviewer directly on their talk page. The only major article problem was the use of excess sources. This makes it difficult for a reviewer as they are expected to examine all the sources carefully. A reviewer would be entitled to fail an article on this ground, but I wanted to work on anyway as I was keen to get your piece published. A more minor detail: Having two images is stretching it a bit becuase the formatting is slightly off. I left them because I quite like them both, though, but if someone else removes them I'll understand why. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1480196 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I overwrote an edit conflict. Please don't edit articles while the {{under review}} tag is on them; it's aim is to prevent edit conflicts. Instead, make comments of any changes you want made on the talk page. Or, feel free to contact the reviewer directly on their talk page. The only major article problem was the use of excess sources. This makes it difficult for a reviewer as they are expected to examine all the sources carefully. A reviewer would be entitled to fail an article on this ground, but I wanted to work on anyway as I was keen to get your piece published. A more minor detail: Having two images is stretching it a bit becuase the formatting is slightly off. I left them because I quite like them both, though, but if someone else removes them I'll understand why. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.